[Note that the topic of my Op Ed changed in it's final draft]
An opinion editorial should be based on an argument that is doable. The thesis statement suggests to adapt the Living Standards for off-campus non-members studying at BYU to give them more freedom to do whatever they feel like, as long as they remain respectable and reliable and don’t damage BYU’s reputation. This is a pretty solid thesis that is actually possible. It is in a good kairos moment because this topic never really gets old, as non-members of the LDS church start their careers in BYU every year and this is a topic that concerns to all of them who want a little more freedom.
The main audience of this editorial is the Office of Off-Campus Housing in BYU, and all of the arguments are directed towards them with the goal of convincing them of the fact that the thesis is actually doable and it doesn’t affect BYU at all. The vocabulary and writing is formal, which adapts well to the audience. A secondary audience to this editorial is those students who are non-members and wish to exercise their usual activities without restrictions, but it is primarily reflected towards the Off-Campus Housing Office. There are no assumptions of common knowledge in this editorial and everything is well explained. The author clearly defines the issue in his thesis statement.
Counter arguments are predicted and prevented by the author. The biggest counter-argument the university might have against this editorial is the fact that if more freedom is allowed to non-members of the church outside of the university, these students might damage the university’s image and reputation by committing acts of dishonesty and immorality. This counter argument is taken care of by the author.
Rhetorical proofs are also used in this paper. Ethos is established when the author talks about his background and tells one of the ways these rules for off-campus living have affected him, so he is identifying with the secondary audience. Pathos is used at the beginning of the introduction, where the author tries to sympathize with the primary audience by recognizing the positive effects of the Honor Code and behavior of BYU. Logos is used in examples like the Testing Center example, where it seems logical to trust students with this responsibility after they have been trusted many other things like these of taking exams without supervision.
MLA formatting conventions are followed and the grammar is good, there are no wordy complicated sentences and because of all of this, this Opinion Editorial is worthy of a shiny A.